Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line SUV vs. Nokian zLine
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian Line SUV has a better rating of 46% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Nokian Line SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Nokian Line SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Line SUV | Nokian zLine | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
1. Nokian zLine 80%
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian zLine 75%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Line SUV ? dB2. Nokian zLine ? dB