Segment
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 vs. Tristar Ice-Plus S210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (47%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 and Tristar Ice-Plus S210, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winguard Snow G WH2 and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested.
| # | Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R13 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 | 42,8 | - | |||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
