Segment
1. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD plus vs. Viking Fourtech
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Viking (25%). In this particular case, the Nexen N blue HD plus has a better rating of 46% compared to 32% of the Viking Fourtech. The first tyre test of Nexen N blue HD plus was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Viking Fourtech first tested. We also know where N blue HD plus is made - Korea.
| # | Nexen N blue HD plus | Viking Fourtech | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory2. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Viking Fourtech ? dB