Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Primacy 4 | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this text comparison, we will analyze two popular summer touring tyres: the Michelin Primacy 4 and the Nokian WetProof. Both of these tyres have received positive reviews and test results, but we will focus on summarizing the data from all tests and give a verdict about the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre.
The Michelin Primacy 4 is a touring summer tyre with a 90% rating from our experts. It is made in Spain, Germany, and Poland and is a successor to the Michelin Primacy 3. With a strong performance in various tests, the Primacy 4 is an excellent choice for drivers who value both comfort and performance. This model has recently been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+.
The Nokian WetProof, on the other hand, is a summer tyre with an 87% rating from our experts. Manufactured in Finland by Nokian, this tyre is specially designed to provide optimal performance during wet conditions. There isn't a newer tyre that replaced this model as of now.
When comparing the two tyres in various test results, the Michelin Primacy 4 consistently performs well. In the Autozeitung test, it ranks 4th out of 10 tyres, whereas the Nokian WetProof ranks 6th. The Primacy 4 also outperforms the WetProof in the ADAC and Autobild tests, ranking 2nd out of 18 tyres and 5th out of 53 tyres, respectively.
However, the Nokian WetProof shines in specific categories. In the GTÜ test, it ranks 2nd out of 9 tyres and has the best features in wet circle cornering, wet handling, and wet handling – objective. Similarly, in the ACE test, the WetProof ranks 1st out of 9 tyres and outperforms the Michelin Primacy 4 in wet braking, wet handling, and wet handling – objective categories.
Notably, in the Firmenauto test, both the Michelin Primacy 4 and Nokian WetProof perform exceptionally well. The Primacy 4 ranks 1st out of 11 tyres, while the WetProof ranks 2nd. Both tyres excel in exterior noise, wet handling, and wet handling – objective categories, with the Primacy 4 having additional strengths in dry braking, comfort, rolling resistance, and wet braking.
In conclusion, the Michelin Primacy 4 is the better choice overall, with a consistently high-ranking performance in various tests. However, the Nokian WetProof excels in wet conditions, making it a valuable option for drivers who prioritize wet performance. Both tyres offer many strengths, but the choice ultimately depends on the individual driver's preferences and driving conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB2. Nokian WetProof 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 125 | 133 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 124 | 114 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,7 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 157 | 68 | 54 | 22 | 20 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 151 | 63 | 53 | 22 | 13 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 66 | 50 | 19 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Good | 8,2 | 8,5 | 7,6 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 35,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 66 | 51 | 19 | 10 | 17 | |
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Recommended | 137 | 57 | 43 | 17 | 8 | 12 | |
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 66 | 45 | 17 | 8 | 17 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 7,9 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 9,0 | 9,0 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||