Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Premium2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran KC53 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Kumho PorTran KC53 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Recommended2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Recommended2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
