• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 79% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.

# Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
/94%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/79%

Add to comparison

Michelin
GoodYear
DimensionsR17 - R21 R14 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ACE
Name WinterWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test62665226
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Rating: Highly recommended
62 584426
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Recommended
56544522
Show test details