Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 79% of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R14 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | |||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | |||
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 54 | 45 | 22 | |||
Show test details |