Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Falken (54%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 59% of the Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro were tested.
| # | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
