Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Falken (54%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 61% of the Falken EuroALL Season AS210. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the EuroALL Season AS210 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | |||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | |||
Falken EuroAll Season AS210 Rating: Recommended | 47 | 49 | 45 | 23 | |||
Show test details |