Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin A4 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Alpin A4 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Michelin Alpin A4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 has B rating.
# | Michelin Alpin A4
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,7 |
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Recommended | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |