Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Tristar Ice-Plus S210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin Alpin 5 and Tristar Ice-Plus S210, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin Alpin 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Tristar Ice-Plus S210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alpin 5 and the Ice-Plus S210 were tested.
| # | Michelin Alpin 5
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
