Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Yokohama (59%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
Show test details |