Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Linglong summer tyres are slightly better rated (39%) than Yokohama (31%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||