Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Laufenn (36%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 64% of the Laufenn I FIT Plus. The first tyre test of Laufenn I FIT Plus was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the I FIT Plus and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Laufenn I FIT Plus
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Satisfactory
1. Laufenn I FIT Plus Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Laufenn I FIT Plus | 35,1 | 30,6 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | 3+ | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Laufenn I FIT Plus | 35,2 | 28,6 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Laufenn I FIT Plus | 36,2 | 24,8 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |