Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Nokian WR SUV 4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WS71 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 4 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Test winner | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
