Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Westlake SW608 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Westlake (10%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has a better rating of 54% compared to 13% of the Westlake SW608. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Westlake SW608 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the SW608 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | Westlake SW608 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Westlake SW608 Lowcost
2. Westlake SW608 28.5
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
2. Westlake SW608 ? dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Westlake SW608 | 34,2 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
Westlake SW608 | 37 | 36,2 | |||||
Show test details |