Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 54% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP71. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 has B rating.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended