18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (71%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 82% compared to 65% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
10
23
Best position
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
6.7
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
144
109

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Wet Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Dry Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Snow Performance
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow Traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Snow Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Snow Circle Cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
59%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ride Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Economy
Confidence
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.