Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Vredestein (57%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 46% of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Vredestein Quatrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the Quatrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the HA32 Solus 4S is made in China and Quatrac Pro is made in Hungary.
# | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42 | 50 | |||||
Show test details |