Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) has a better rating of 90% compared to 71% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta Sport (PS72) and the Ultrac Pro were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R18 - R45 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
