Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 has a better rating of 75% compared to 16% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS91 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the Pilot Sport 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 84% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea and Pilot Sport 4 is made in Spain/Germany.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,4 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,3 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 9,5 | 9,5 | 8,0 | ||||
Show test details |