Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 has a better rating of 58% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the Sportrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 1,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 3,2 | 1,8 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||