Segment
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
# | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | Firestone Roadhawk | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Show test details |