• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 82% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A rating.

# Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
/48%
 		Bridgestone Turanza T005
/89%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Summer tyre test 2019 185/65 R15
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,52,10,51,4
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Rating: Satisfactory		2,82,82,82,02,0
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good		1,9 1,5 2,92,02,3
Show test details
Autobild Summer tyre test 2018 195/65 R15
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,534,3
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH2738,340,4
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,734,3
Show test details