Segment
1. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Road Performance vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Poland. Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kormoran (9%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto HP2 has a better rating of 70% compared to 9% of the Kormoran Road Performance. The first tyre test of Kormoran Road Performance was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Debica Presto HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the Presto HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Road Performance has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran Road Performance
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kormoran Road Performance Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,2 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
