Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Linglong Grip Master 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Linglong Grip Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this text, we are going to compare the characteristics of two tyres, that are popular among owners of all-round vehicles - the Kleber Quadraxer 3 and the Linglong Grip Master 4S.
The Kleber Quadraxer 3, made in Poland, is the successor of the Kleber Quadraxer 2. According to our rating, it was able to improve the good reputation of the previous model, scoring 87%. It has been lauded particularly for its comfort, exterior noise level, snow cornering, and snow traction. This was confirmed by the AUTOBILD test, where the Quadraxer 3 was ranked 7th out of 37 tyres tested. The tyre also showed good performance in snow and dry conditions and resisted aquaplaning efficiently, but critics have noted a delayed response in steering and a tendency to understeer in wet handling.
On the other hand, detail information on the Linglong Grip Master 4S is not as extensive. Its main strengths are its comfort and price to value ratio, according to the AUTOBILD test, placing it 14th out of 37 tyres. The tyre demonstrates safe handling on dry surfaces and has a high running performance. However, it has been criticized for its poor performance in snowy and wet conditions and lack of reserves in case of aquaplaning.
Another test by autobild 2024 puts the Quadraxer 3 at position 8 out of 35 tested tyres, while the Grip Master 4S was further down the list at 20th place.
In conclusion, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 seems to be generally better equipped for a wider spectrum of conditions, especially in the winter months. While with the Linglong Grip Master 4S, you can expect a more comfortable and economical tyre suitable for dry conditions.
Kleber, a company traditionally associated with quality all-round tyres, once again confirms its reputation with the Quadraxer 3 model. On the other hand, the Linglong manufacturer, showing the Grip Master 4S tyre, demonstrates that even economical tyres can offer a decent level of comfort and dry surface handling.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 4 | 3+ | 4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.5 | 58.4 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 40.2 | 59.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 41.3 | 53 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
