Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Apollo Aspire XP
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Apollo Aspire XP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When debating between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Apollo Aspire XP, there are several key factors to consider. Both of these tyres are classified as summer tyres, and in tests, they exhibit unique strengths and downsides.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP, produced by Kleber, achieves an impressive rating of 68%, putting it in the upper echelon of tyres. It hasn't been replaced by a newer model, solidifying its continuing relevance in the market. It holds its own in mutual tests, such as the Autobild test where it secured the 15th position out of 53 total tyres.
Evidently, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP is robust. Its strength clearly lies in its considerable rating, suggesting quality construction and performance attributes. Still, it would be beneficial to have a detailed breakdown of its individual features which unfortunately is not available from the given data. Its relatively high position in comparative tests indicates that it performs admirably alongside its direct competitors.
In contrast, the Apollo Aspire XP, a product of Apollo manufacturer, has a slightly less impressive rating of 53%. Despite its lower rating, it interestingly managed to edge ahead of the Kleber Dynaxer UHP in the Autobild test by securing the 14th position.
The Apollo Aspire XP's key strengths, as identified in the Autobild test, include its rolling resistance. High rolling resistance is often associated with energy loss and reduced fuel-efficiency, thus it seems that the Apollo Aspire XP excels in this crucial aspect. However, a lot remains unknown about the features of this tyre due to lack of information.
In a head-to-head comparison between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Apollo Aspire XP based on the provided data, the Kleber tyre edges out the Apollo tyre in terms of the overall rating. However, it appears that the Apollo tyre may have advantages in certain crucial features such as rolling resistance. Ultimately, choosing between these two tyres will largely depend on the consumer's specific needs and driving conditions.
It's important to remember that both these tyres haven't been replaced by newer models, which indicates their continuing effective performance and popularity among users. However, for a more comprehensive comparison, a deeper analysis of additional tyre attributes and features would be required.
In conclusion, both the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Apollo Aspire XP are competitive summer tyres, each with its own strengths. Yet, if the overall rating is a deciding factor, Kleber Dynaxer UHP seems to have an edge.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
