Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 has a better rating of 74% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Dynaxer HP4 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
Show test details |