Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (57%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 83% compared to 69% of the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210. The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the WetProof were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||