Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 vs. Michelin e.Primacy
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kenda (59%). In this particular case, the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 has a better rating of 69% compared to 66% of the Michelin e.Primacy. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the e.Primacy were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | Michelin e.Primacy | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||