18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. CST Medallion Winter WCP1 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST). Generally, CST winter tyres are slightly better rated (14%) than Imperial (11%). In this particular case, the Imperial SnowDragon UHP has a better rating of 17% compared to 14% of the CST Medallion Winter WCP1. The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the CST Medallion Winter WCP1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Medallion Winter WCP1 were tested.

Test Profile

Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
CST
Medallion Winter WCP1
Number of tests
6
3
Best position
#9
#30
Average position
24.7
33.7
Latest test
2025
2025
Available sizes
68
49

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
52%
CST Medallion Winter WCP1
40%
Aquaplaning - cross
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
46%
CST Medallion Winter WCP1
11%
Wet braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
51%
CST Medallion Winter WCP1
49%
Wet handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
55%
Snow
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
66%
CST Medallion Winter WCP1
43%
Snow braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
64%
CST Medallion Winter WCP1
49%
Snow handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
65%
Dry
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
75%
Comfort
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
90%
Costs
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.