Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 101,6 | 299,9 | 299,9 | 100 | 101,1 | 100,7 | |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 99,3 | 294,4 | 297,6 | 96,2 | 79,6 | 98,1 | |
Nokian WR Snowproof | 97,2 | 290,8 | 278,9 | 96,4 | 100 | 97,6 | |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Show test details |