Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Michelin Alpin A4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 and Michelin Alpin A4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Alpin A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Michelin Alpin A4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Michelin Alpin A4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
