Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK510 has a better rating of 74% compared to 67% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2022 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made in Hungary and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.
# | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 | Falken Azenis FK510 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R99 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 6,3 | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 7,3 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 7,9 | |||
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,5 | 7,2 | |||
Show test details |