Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Linglong Green-Max
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Linglong (39%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Green-Max were tested. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Linglong Green-Max | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Dry steering response
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Highly recommended | 240 | 111 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||