Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (76%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 77% compared to 48% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime 4 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R13 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Show test details |