Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Vredestein Quatrac Pro are two all-round tyres produced by Hankook and Vredestein, respectively. This comparison reviews their performance in tests, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses and giving you a comprehensive overview of the tyres.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is the updated version of the Hankook Kinergy 4S, and it received an 88% rating on our tyre tests website. This tyre excels in aquaplaning resistance, both cross and longitudinal, making it a reliable choice in wet conditions. However, it has a high rolling resistance, which may affect fuel efficiency.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro is a newer and doesn't have a predecessor. It received a 78% rating on our site. This tyre performs exceptionally well in wet braking and wet handling situations. However, its grip in snow and dry conditions is relatively poor, and it has the highest rolling resistance among the tyres tested.
From the mutual tests, we can see that the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 ranks in 8th place for snow handling in the Autobild test out of 31 tyres, while the Vredestein Quatrac Pro excels in several categories such as exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, wet circle cornering, wet handling, and snow traction, placing it in 3rd position in the overall test. In TyreReviews.com 2022, the Hankook tyre performed extremely well in the aquaplaning resistance, wet braking, wet handling, and grip in snow and dry conditions, with only the high rolling resistance as its downside. The Vredestein tyre was the best in the test for wet grip, wet braking, and wet handling lap, but its low grip in snow, dry, and aquaplaning resistance and high rolling resistance are its weaknesses.
In conclusion, if you're looking for a tyre with excellent wet performance, low noise, and great snow capabilities, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a great choice. However, be prepared for higher rolling resistance that can affect your fuel efficiency. On the other hand, if wet braking and handling are your main concerns, along with low internal noise, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro delivers outstanding performance in these categories but falls short in snow and dry grip and has a high rolling resistance. Overall, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right one depends on your priorities and driving conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42 | 50 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42 | 50,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
