Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (65%). The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating. We also know where Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made - Korea.
# | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42 | 50,8 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Show test details |