Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the arena of all-season tyres, two prominent competitors - Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 - have proven their mettle. Crafted by South Korea-based manufacturer Hankook and Czech Republic-based maker Continental respectively, these tyres feature major strengths with minor areas of improvement.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 stands as the successor to the Hankook Kinergy 4S model, bringing additional advancements on board. This tyre secured a laudable second position in the SportAuto test, proving its superiority over numerous competitors. Its standout features include commendable behaviour in aquaplaning situations, as observed in the Autobild test. However, it stands at the eighth position in terms of total tyres in this particular test. From a performance viewpoint, it exhibits reliable traction on snow and ice, sharp steering response, and a remarkable mileage. The only drawbacks are slightly prolonged braking distances on wet and dry tracks.
On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has also made its presence felt in this segment. It boasts an impressive seal of approval with a first position in the SportAuto test. Moreover, this model secured the second position in the Autobild test, where it was praised for its low exterior noise, great snow-handling characteristics, and excellent wet braking qualities. In terms of performance, it is a versatile tyre that displays convincing winter qualities, dynamic handling, short braking distances on wet roads, low rolling noise, and high mileage. However, it does exhibit a slight tendency towards understeering.
Looking at the test results and performance analysis, both tyres hold their ground well, but with a higher overall score of 89% versus 85% and better performance in mutual tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 edges past the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, making it the better overall tyre in this comparison.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Very good | 9.5 | 8.2 | 10.0 | 8.9 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Outstanding | 8.8 | 8.9 | 9.2 | 10.0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
