Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco2 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kumho (56%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco2 and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 58% of Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.
| # | Hankook K435 Kinergy Eco2
| Kumho PorTran CW51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
