14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than GoodYear (69%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings.

#	GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /94%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 122

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 21x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 8.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.29

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2024

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

84%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 94%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 88%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 58%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV

78%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 70%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands