Segment
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you are looking to compare summer tyres, your search could end with the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Both of these tyres have had impressive track records, but let's delve into the key differences and similarities.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, successor of the Efficient Grip Performance, impresses with our rating of 87% and has constantly ranked high in various tests. In the AutoBild test out of 53, the Goodyear tyre secured the 13th position by impressing reviewers with its mileage and price to performance ratio. Known for its Comfort, it has consistently scored high in these parameters. However, a word of caution, the premium profile comes with a higher price tag. Goodyear, the manufacturer of this remarkable tyre, is known for producing high-quality products, and the Efficient Grip Performance 2 is no exception.
Moving to the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, with our rating of 82%. This summer tyre showcased good environmental balance and efficiency in Autobild 2024's review. The Dynaxer HP4 stood 14th in the AutoBild test out of 53 tyres and received appreciation for its comfort and external noise. However, there were noted weaknesses on the wet surface. The tyre demonstrated great aquaplaning features, short wet and dry braking distances and good driving comfort with a quiet roll noise. Despite these positive features, a slow steering response time and weaker grip on wet surfaces were its drawbacks. Find more details about this product on Kleber's official page.
If we go by the tests results overall, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seemingly outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, however, both tyres have a strong set of unique strengths and weaknesses making the ultimate decision dependent on individual user preference and requirements.
In conclusion, if budget isn't your concern and you're looking for superior handling characteristics, then the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 should be your first choice. However, if you're looking for a tyre with environmental efficiency and superior comfort, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 would be a great choice.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
