18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than GoodYear (82%). The first tyre test of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is made in Slovenia/Germany and PremiumContact 6 is made in Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.

Test Profile

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
15
36
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
2.3
3.1
Latest test
2022
2023
Available sizes
188
319

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Dry braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
73%
Dry handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Dry handling - objective
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
95%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Safety
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
98%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Wet braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Wet handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
98%
Wet handling - objective
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
97%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Interior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Fuel efficiency
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Price/value
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Offroad
Confidence
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Handling on gravel
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Grass traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Gravel traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Mud traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Sand traction
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 12 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
PromobilPromobil
Summer
2022235/55 R17View
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Summer
2021225/40 R18View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Summer
2020225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
ADACADAC
Summer
2020225/40 R18View
Gute-FahrtGute-Fahrt
Summer
2019225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019245/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
Tyre ReviewsTyre Reviews
Summer
2021225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.