Segment
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Goodyear (85%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Cargo UltraGrip 2 and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.
# | Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |