Segment
1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle2. Giti Premium H1 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Premium H1 vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti summer tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Yokohama (31%). In this particular case, the Giti Premium H1 has a better rating of 51% compared to 23% of the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50. The first tyre test of Giti Premium H1 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Premium H1 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. We also know where Premium H1 is made - China.
| # | Giti Premium H1 | Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Giti Premium H1 10.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Giti Premium H1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Giti Premium H1 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
1. Giti Premium H1 100%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry steering response
Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Giti Premium H1 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Giti Premium H1 | 212 | 88 | 124 | ||||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 | 199 | 77 | 122 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||