Segment
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti GitiWinter W1 vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Nexen (43%). In this particular case, the Giti GitiWinter W1 has a better rating of 61% compared to 32% of the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2. The first tyre test of Giti GitiWinter W1 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter W1 and the Winguard Snow G WH2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Winter W1 is made - China.
| # | Giti GitiWinter W1 | Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R13 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Recommended2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Still recommended2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Still recommended | 7,2 | ||||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Still recommended | 7,3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,9 | 28 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 | 36,8 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||