Segment
1. Giti Gitisynergy H2 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitisynergy H2 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
| # | Giti Gitisynergy H2
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we are analysing two summer tyres: the Giti Gitisynergy H2 and the Nexen N Fera Primus. Let's dive right into the performance data collected from several tyre tests.
Giti Gitisynergy H2
The Giti Gitisynergy H2, produced by Giti, has been examined in a number of tyre tests. It achieved positions well down in the field in the Autobild and ADAC tests, securing 17th and 29th places respectively. The strengths of this model include secure handling on wet surfaces and short dry braking distances, making it a competent choice for summer weather. Plus, its price tag is moderate. On the downside, it exhibits a certain tendency to understeer on dry roads and has significantly high rolling resistance - something that might impact fuel efficiency.
Nexen N Fera Primus
On the flip side, the Nexen N Fera Primus from Nexen performs considerably better. In both the Autobild and ADAC tests, this model came in an impressive 10th and 11th place respectively which is a laudable performance given the high number of participating tyres. It offers good braking performance and dynamic handling on wet surfaces, which is a big plus during typical summer downpours. However, the tests point out a potential delay in steering response and a potentially limited lifespan, which may affect the tyre's economy and longevity.
Final Verdict
In conclusion, the Nexen N Fera Primus stands out as a more competent and reliable performer in tyre tests overall. It consistently beat the Giti Gitisynergy H2 in mutual test standings, and exhibits both solid braking performance and dynamic wet handling, which is ideal for summer use. However, prospective buyers should also consider factors like longevity and fuel efficiency - areas where the Giti Gitisynergy H2 could hold potential advantages despite its generally lower rankings in tests.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.672. Giti Gitisynergy H2 16.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 | 36,6 | 29,8 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 3,4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
