Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to quality and performance, two tyres that have often been compared are the Fulda SportControl 2 and the Linglong Sport Master. Both tyres are designed for usage during the summer, with the Linglong Sport Master featuring a UHP subtype. Let's delve into the details to assess their strengths, weaknesses, and how they perform relative to each other in tests.
Fulda SportControl 2
The Fulda SportControl 2, manufactured by Fulda, has been rated with a 69% score by us, indicating good quality and performance. However, in recent Autobild tests it took the 18th place out of 50 tyres indicating it may lag when it comes to the race among top tier tyres. Its strengths were noted to be its handling characteristics on wet roads, and it comes at a lower price compared to competitors. Yet, it's worth noting the critiques mention extended wet braking distances and slightly delayed steering response.
Linglong Sport Master
The Linglong Sport Master is known to be a good competitor, coming in with a rating of 72% from us. Moreover, it climbed up the ladder landing in the top 10 at the 7th position in the Autobild tests. Praise was given to this tyre for its exterior noise and impressive performance. Nevertheless, some of the potential drawbacks noted include its low mileage and less than stellar comfort.
According to tests conducted by Autobild in 2022, the Linglong Sport Master provided short braking distances, dynamic and safe handling behavior in all weather conditions, and good sidewall guidance. Unfortunately, its low mileage and under-steering dry handling were points of criticism.
Meanwhile, the Fulda SportControl 2 received a good word for its balanced safe handling properties on wet roads and its cost-effectiveness. The extended wet braking distances and slightly delayed steering behavior remained concerns.
Conclusion
In comparison, the Linglong Sport Master appears to outdoes the Fulda SportControl 2 overall, scoring better in the ratings and tests. However, factors like price, specific performance features, and personal preference could play a role in one's selection. Be sure to reflect on your specific needs and requirements before making a final purchasing decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
