Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Wanli SW611 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Wanli SW611
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Wanli). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Wanli (1%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Wanli SW611 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the SW611 were tested.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | Wanli SW611 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Wanli SW611 16.
Worst position in test
1. Wanli SW611 16.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
| Wanli SW611 Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||