Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 29% of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | Nokian WR Snowproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient