Segment
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Tristar (34%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 has a better rating of 69% compared to 34% of the Tristar Ecopower 4. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Tristar Ecopower 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EcoControl HP2 and the Ecopower 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Tristar Ecopower 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Lowcost
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Tristar Ecopower 4 Conditionally recommended
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
Tristar Ecopower 4 | 39,5 | 32,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | |||
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Recommended | 55 | 46 | 16 | 6 | |||
Tristar Ecopower 4 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 46 | 40 | 16 | 6 | |||
Show test details |